Welcome to TrumpetMaster.com

You are currently viewing our trumpet site as a guest, which gives you limited access to many features. By joining our community you will be able to post topics in our trumpet forum, place ads in our classifieds, add your upcoming event to our calendar, communicate privately with other members (PM), and access many other special features. Registration is fast, simple and absolutely free!

We hope you will join our community today!


Go Back   TrumpetMaster > Equipment > Mouthpieces / Mutes / Other


Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes
Old 04-30-2007, 07:50 PM   #21 (permalink)
trumpetbaby
New Friend
 
Join Date: Dec 2006
Location: South Carolina
Posts: 11
trumpetbaby will become famous soon enough
Send a message via AIM to trumpetbaby
Re: Why go below 3?

thanks a lot.
trumpetbaby is offline  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote
Old 04-30-2007, 09:51 PM   #22 (permalink)
BudBix
Pianissimo User
 
BudBix's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: Atlanta, GA
Posts: 172
BudBix is an unknown quantity at this point
Send a message via AIM to BudBix
Re: Why go below 3?

Quote:
Originally Posted by Manny Laureano View Post

I'm often surprised when someone walks in to play for me and I hear themselves describing themsleves as having a fat sound. To me people often sound thin and somewhat nasal. Just for fun, I'll have them play something a little larger and they find they can handle it just fine with a little adjustment in the way they play. They realize the mouthpiece they've been playing is okay but with a little more work they can handle a larger mouthpiece and have a sound that is more than "okay".


ML
Manny do you think playing a larger mouthpiece requires more practice time to maintain endurance and range?
__________________
Men govern nothing with more difficulty than their tongues, and can moderate their desires more than their words. - Baruch Spinoza
BudBix is offline  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote
Old 05-01-2007, 11:07 AM   #23 (permalink)
Mikey
Forte User
 
Join Date: Oct 2003
Posts: 1,864
Mikey is on a distinguished road
Re: Why go below 3?

**

Last edited by Mikey; 05-18-2007 at 08:39 PM.
Mikey is offline  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote
Old 05-01-2007, 12:10 PM   #24 (permalink)
rowuk
Moderator
Fortissimo User
 
rowuk's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2006
Location: Germany
Posts: 4,365
rowuk is a splendid one to beholdrowuk is a splendid one to beholdrowuk is a splendid one to beholdrowuk is a splendid one to beholdrowuk is a splendid one to beholdrowuk is a splendid one to beholdrowuk is a splendid one to behold
Re: Why go below 3?

Why go below 3 - because it is there!
Seriously, I always ask the same question first - what does your present equipment not do? What makes you think a bigger mouthpiece can cure that.
Bigger mouthpieces allow for more lip mass in the cup. That can produce a bigger sound, but does require more practice if you want to play high. Bigger mouthpieces also give players that do not practice as much as they should a little more leeway when playing.
I do not agree with Mr. Lindermann or Vizzuti. They do not work on a regular basis with with people that only practice 2 - 6 hours a week. If you practice enough you can play anything well and smaller is less work, giving them more margin for error when they are on the road! They do not need to BLEND with anybody using that equipment so it makes sense. If you do not have that routine, forgiving equipment can be a blessing and bigger is more forgiving - up to a point.
If you want to experiment, make sure that you do so during a time when you don't have any critical gigs. If it didn't work, you would have a serious problem. Less than 4 weeks with a mouthpiece is not representative or a fair chance!
__________________
Whenever I feel blue, I start breathing again.
rowuk is offline  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote
Old 05-01-2007, 12:48 PM   #25 (permalink)
dcstep
Mezzo Piano User
 
Join Date: Nov 2003
Location: Denver
Posts: 680
dcstep is on a distinguished road
Re: Why go below 3?

Many of the response so far seem to presume that we all play with the same embouchure. That's just not the case. Although there are literally hundreds of variations, let's just look at my own experience with rolled-in vs. rolled-out.

A few years back I was trying a more rolled-in setting and kept gravitating toward smaller and smaller mpcs and ended up around .64" in diameter (7C-ish). Because of troubles controlling that embouchure (no troubles at all with tone), Pops convinced me that I'm a rolled-out kind of guy and I moved to larger mpcs, ultimately landing in the .67" range.

For Bb trumpet my main mpc is a GR 66.8B2.8, which is a 1-1/2C-ish design but with an alpha, beta and throat that gives me the support I need. I've got around 6 GRs that vary slightly from my main mpc, but this mpc gives me the individual compromise between range, tone, endurance and ease that I seek. With only a few hours of practice per week I maintain a very solid (free and open at any dynamic) high-C and with just a little extra practice I can play cleanly up to E. The G is also there, but requires some build up to work there.

If I pull out the GR65M in my kit and play with my normal rolled out embouchure, it CUTS my range and endurance. There's not room for me to play that mpc with my lips rolled out.

OTOH, many years ago, when my instructor directed me to start using a 1-1/2C (coming off a 7C) with no auditioning or comparisions, he did me a disservice, because my embouchure did not support a 1-1/2C. At 12 I was already 6' tall and 175 lbs, so my lips were close to as big as they would get. It wasn't a matter of my lips not matching the mpc, but my embouchure did not and the instructor gave me no tools to transition. I suffered, unknowing, with this poorly matched setup for decades.

Finally, IMHO, if it takes four weeks to adjust to a mpc, then the mpc is a poor match. I think that you can hear and feel differences in a good match immediately and only two to three days of trial are needed to assure that it's not due to a compensation that's not natural. (We compensate for the weaknesses in our equipment/body matches and when an equipment weakness is taken away we need to "uncompensate". When the compensation is removed, then the equipment answer can be different than we first presumed when we were still compensating. This is the honeymoon effect.)

Bottom line; the mpc needs to match your embouchure type. Selecting a mpc by size is folly.

Dave
__________________
Schilke '60 B1
Selmer Paris -- '57 #20 K-Modified/
'03 Concept TT w/ GR66.8B2.8
'94 Lawler TL cornet w/ Sparx 2B
Conn Vintage One flugel - GR66FD
www.pitpops.com www.ucm-inc.com
Rocky Mountain Trumpet Fest
dcstep is offline  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote
Reply



Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On


Unleash Your Anger

TrumpetMaster
Copyright 2006 TrumpetMaster.com
All times are GMT -4. The time now is 02:38 AM.

Powered by vBadvanced CMPS v2.2.0/Links 1.01
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.7.2
Copyright ©2000 - 2008, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Search Engine Optimization by vBSEO 3.0.0 RC8

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31