Thread: Why Cs?
View Single Post
Old 05-31-2005, 03:24 PM   #5 (permalink)
wiseone2
Artitst in Residence

Forte User
 
wiseone2's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2003
Location: Brooklyn,NY
Posts: 2,376
wiseone2 is just really nicewiseone2 is just really nicewiseone2 is just really nicewiseone2 is just really nicewiseone2 is just really nice
Quote:
Originally Posted by Clarino
That's a very good article, which goes into quite a lot of depth.

But in a nutshell, everyone in the US does it because Bud did it.



I seriously doubt most guys in the US (watch now as Willmer, Manny et al leap in to prove me wrong! ) can even give a coherent reason to use the C trumpet rather than the Bb.

The article Govtmodel linked suggests that the C is less prone to splitting notes, but frankly I think most people would agree that it's the player that splits a not note the horn. The only plus side I can see is that transposition becomes marginally easier, Bud mentioned this in something I read about his motivation for using the C trumpet.

Apart from that, I think it's just a sheep mentality, young Americans get into thinking that they need a C trumpet to play orchestral music with the big boys just because all the top guys in the US orchestras now use C trumpets for most repertoire.

Silly really.
Well................ Mager, Caston, Krauss, Voisin and Vacchiano preceded Bud in the use of the C. Harry Glantz was a hold-out for the Bb trumpet.
Boston, Philadelphia and the New York Philharmonic were far better known and more recorded than the CSO.
The Bach C trumpet was the break through horn in America. Players flocked to the Bach.
Think about it....... can you come up with any other american maker of C trumpets until Schilke?
Blame Vincent Bach for making great playable higher trumpets that caused the dominance of the C trumpet in American Orchestras.
Wilmer
__________________
Be sure Brain is engaged before putting Mouthpiece in gear.
S.Suark 1951
wiseone2 is offline   Reply With Quote