Page 5 of 5 FirstFirst 12345
Results 41 to 42 of 42
Like Tree23Likes
Trumpet Discussion Discuss Home Ultrasonic Cleaner in the General forums; No fight! Simply a presentation of different views about Ultrasound - none backed up with Ultrasound data - because it ...
  1. #41
    Moderator Utimate User rowuk's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2006

    Re: Home Ultrasonic Cleaner

    No fight! Simply a presentation of different views about Ultrasound - none backed up with Ultrasound data - because it seems no one has bothered to test for the use case "sound", "intonation" or "response". I never said that it was bad or good, I simply raised some logical questions that no one has yet been able to address.

    The spectral information about changes in the "sound" of specific well played trumpets vs. a little played control instrument only serves to show that the much played trumpet changes spectrally with age in spite of good maintenance habits. I believe that this is due to changes in the stress patterns in the metal caused by the vibration of playing as well as the mechanical act of holding the instrument. I am sure that a day in a hot or freezing trunk also plays a role in the aging of the brass.

    None of these instruments have been or will be ultrasounded. I have zero experience with trumpets and ultrasound. I do have my wifes ruined glasses and the firsthand knowledge that Mercedes and Volkswagen had serious issues with ultrasounded fuel injector nozzles failing (only the ultrasounded ones). I also have firsthand knowledge about ultrasound and precision tools (where a "depends" is quantified!).

    None of this necessarily needs to apply to the devices sold for musical instruments used in a predefined way. If the techs have never asked the question, how do we know? What is that predefined way? When does it make sense to not use ultrasound instead of chemical or mechanical means - the only resounding answer in this thread was: when it is financially worth it.

    I know of no collection of data on things like failed solder joints, temper, sound(timbre), intonation, response or anything else. In fact, I only know of a couple of places in a position to objectively test for this type of change: Smith-Watkins and the Institute Wiener Klangstyl for instance.

    Think about this: how long are the cryo threads?, what about gap?, what about dark sound? Why are those threads so long? Because those that have experimented and those that have not feel a need to say something - whether the experimentation was bad or the "hunch was good", take a side..........

    I am sorry if the only qualified response in this thread "no one has complained yet" is not good enough for me. I am sorry if someone feels that my questions may endanger their investment. Just use my response as something to consider. In real life it may be "good enough".
    Whenever I feel blue, I start breathing again.

  2. #42
    Forte User musicalmason's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2003

    Re: Home Ultrasonic Cleaner

    Ok. I don't think your concerns endanger anybody's investment. I think this is because your logical questions have been addressed and your concerns come from a place of personal theoretical opinion and are not based on actual experiences.

    When is it not appropriate to use ultrasound? When a horn has red rot or otherwise weakened brass. When a horn has old cellulose lacquer.

    Is there a collection of data on failed solder joints and intonation changes? No, because uc does not effect solder or intonation. That statement is based on the opinions of thousands of pro players who have had their instruments uc'd and not noticed a change in any of those areas. Does that basically boil down to "nobody has complained yet"? Yes. I don't see how that is not a good enough system. It works for the FDA. If 10,000 people take a pill, and none of them complain about their teeth falling out, should the manufacturer still do a study on teeth falling out, and every other potential but un noted side effect? I mean why bother? Nobody has complained yet. Sorry for the crude metaphors, but you get my point.

    Your spectral analysis of used vs unused horns proves that horns change with use, not that horns change with vibration. I don't think anybody will argue that putting hours of playtime on a horn, taking it on and off stands, using mutes etc... Can change a horn to some degree. That doesn't prove anything about playing vibrations (which are not even similar to ultrasonic vibrations anyway).
    rowuk likes this.
    Bach strad 180s ML 37 melk 525, mk sterling semi round slide
    Curry 60m
    blessing anniversary flugel curry 3fl
    Al's Music Shop
    Specializing in unique and hard to find instruments.

Page 5 of 5 FirstFirst 12345

Thread Information

Users Browsing this Thread

There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)

Similar Threads

  1. Lens Cleaner = Valve Oil?
    By Maxim A. Potashov in forum Mouthpieces / Mutes / Other
    Replies: 4
    Last Post: 11-29-2013, 07:43 AM
  2. Ultrasonic cleaner unit
    By trumpetpr in forum Mouthpieces / Mutes / Other
    Replies: 3
    Last Post: 06-23-2013, 07:15 PM
  3. Brass Cleaner - I finally found it!
    By gzent in forum Horns
    Replies: 12
    Last Post: 06-13-2013, 11:39 AM
  4. Ultrasonic Cleaner
    By Guinness in forum Trumpet Discussion
    Replies: 5
    Last Post: 01-15-2007, 01:13 PM
  5. Slide Cleaner
    By ernieo2 in forum Horns
    Replies: 6
    Last Post: 02-17-2005, 06:21 PM

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26