![]() |
![]() | ![]() | ![]() | ![]() | ![]() | ![]() | ![]() |
|
Welcome to TrumpetMaster.com You are currently viewing our trumpet site as a guest, which gives you limited access to many features. By joining our community you will be able to post topics in our trumpet forum, place ads in our classifieds, add your upcoming event to our calendar, communicate privately with other members (PM), and access many other special features. Registration is fast, simple and absolutely free! We hope you will join our community today! |
![]() |
![]() | | LinkBack | Thread Tools | Display Modes | ![]() |
| | #1 (permalink) |
| Pianissimo User
Join Date: Nov 2003
Posts: 147
| Nuclear World James Lovelock, inventor of the GAIA theory and a prominent environmentalist, has announced his position that: "Nuclear is the only practical energy source that we could apply in time to offset the threat from accumulating greenhouse gases." What do you think about that? |
| | |
| | #2 (permalink) |
| Forte User
Join Date: Nov 2003
Location: Rochester, MN
Brand: Forza
Posts: 1,515
| Nuclear power, fision now and fusion later on, should be our main source of electricity, but silly politics prevent this from happening. As for "accumulating greenhouse gases" and global warming I have a very hard time believing any of the predictions because the "models" used to predict global changes are not even able to accurately predict the past decade, much less the future. |
| | |
| | #6 (permalink) |
| Pianissimo User
Join Date: Nov 2003
Posts: 147
| wrong, wrong, wrong. gzent -- You use "breeder" reactors instead of "thermal" ones, these use what is currently wasted for fuel. Fuel usage is multiplied by factor of about 100 [it makes "breeds" its own fuel], you can use uranium and thorium for fuel. theory is there will be little or no long lived radioactive waste left to bury |
| | |
| | #8 (permalink) |
| Forte User
Join Date: Nov 2003
Location: Rochester, MN
Brand: Forza
Posts: 1,515
| Yes, technically you could reuse spent fuel rods if it were economically feasible, but breeder reactors are not. There are none in the US and only a handful remaining in Europe. Again, politics have all but killed them. As for fusion: "Progress in fusion research has been promising, but the development of practical systems for creating a stable fusion reaction that produces more power than it consumes will probably take decades to realize. The research is expensive, as well. " - "Nuclear Energy," Microsoft® Encarta® Online Encyclopedia 2004 See: http://encarta.msn.com/encyclopedia_...ar_Energy.html for a nice, easy read on the subject. |
| | |
| | #9 (permalink) |
| Pianissimo User
Join Date: Nov 2003
Posts: 147
| Apparently not everyone got the same message regarding costs of fast breeder reactors. The Japanese are proceeding [although with some political problems] to deploy fast breeder reactors: http://www.jnc.go.jp/zmonju/mjweb/ As is India: http://www1.timesofindia.indiatimes....artid=39483275 As well as a number of other countries that are proceeding with fast reactors: http://www.jnc.go.jp/zmonju/mjweb/worldmen.htm [this is the listing of the countries on the Monju site] |
| | |
| | #10 (permalink) | |
| Pianissimo User
Join Date: Nov 2003
Location: Cape Canaveral
Posts: 93
| Quote:
They'll be perfectly safe. After all, the oil was in there for millions of years. | |
|
__________________ John Kanstul Chicago 1070 GR 62M The Mute Rack!! http://home.cfl.rr.com/themuterack/ Cape Canaveral | ||
| | |
| |
![]() Copyright 2006 TrumpetMaster.com |
All times are GMT -4. The time now is 01:54 PM.
Powered by vBadvanced CMPS v2.2.0/Links 1.01 Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.9 Copyright ©2000 - 2008, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd. Search Engine Optimization by vBSEO 3.0.0 RC8 |