![]() |
![]() | ![]() | ![]() | ![]() | ![]() | ![]() | ![]() |
|
Welcome to TrumpetMaster.com You are currently viewing our trumpet site as a guest, which gives you limited access to many features. By joining our community you will be able to post topics in our trumpet forum, place ads in our classifieds, add your upcoming event to our calendar, communicate privately with other members (PM), and access many other special features. Registration is fast, simple and absolutely free! We hope you will join our community today! |
| |||||||
![]() |
| | LinkBack | Thread Tools | Search this Thread | Display Modes |
| | #1 (permalink) |
| Pianissimo User Join Date: Mar 2004
Posts: 70
![]() | 1600 WB issues...... Well, I have been trying the 1600 out of late and I must say I am in love with how this thing plays! Almost like it was taylor made for my playing stlye. It seems so effortless compared to all the other horns I have played. My only concern is the tone quality of this horn. It seems to lack a richness and high overtones present on all the other Kanstuls. The one I have is brushed lacquer and I wonder if the lacquer itself is causing this. Or maybe it is the secial leadpipe?? Has anyone out ther tried the silver and the lacquer?? Any differences?? Buying a new horn is agonizing..... Jon |
| | |
| | #2 (permalink) |
| Piano User Join Date: Dec 2003 Location: Toronto
Posts: 268
![]() | I don't have any experience with Kanstul horns(except a few brief moments with a superb soprano cornet) but generally lacquer is darker and silver is brighter. This is because lacquer kills high overtones and silver accentuates them. This can be good sometimes. For example, lacquer flugels seem to be more popular than silver ones. So, if you like the response of the lacquer 1600 but want a clearer, brighter sound with more high overtones than I would definatly try to get ahold of a silver one to try before you rule out that model. A silver 1600 might solve all your problems.
__________________ For sale: Courtois 154 flugel http://www.trumpetherald.com/marketp...detail&id=5375 Kanstul 1500 Bb copper bell http://www.trumpetherald.com/marketp...detail&id=7504 |
| | |
| | #3 (permalink) |
| New Friend Join Date: Jan 2004
Posts: 38
![]() | Kanstul 1600 (WB) First of all I think that all trumpets are a compromise in some way or form. This Kanstul has a lighter weight bell. So, the sound isn't as full as say a heavy bell. But, it lights up fast and will get brighter up high and it has a more open feel. I play a silver 1600, and I use a small weight in the bottom of the third valve. You could try using one ,two or three heavy caps. This will give the sound more core or body. Jim |
| | |
| | #4 (permalink) |
| New Friend Join Date: Nov 2003 Location: York, PA
Posts: 15
![]() | Jon, This thread is a little old, but did you make a decision on the finish for that WB yet?
__________________ Playing For Him, ConnMan Kanstul ZKT 1600 "WB" w/ Kanstul two-piece B3C & S72 BB Connstellation 38B Kanstul CCF 925 Flugelhorn (copper bell) w/ Kanstul two-piece BFL3C w/ 119S BB Jupiter 416BL Pocket Trpt. |
| | |
| | #5 (permalink) |
| Pianissimo User Join Date: Mar 2004
Posts: 70
![]() | Hey Connman, I like that name. I did decide on a finish. I went for the lightweight copper bell in a brushed finish. This should be an interesting horn. Hopefully I didn't ruin a masterpiece. I'll let you know how it plays when it get it!! Hopefully not much longer. |
| | |
![]() |
| Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests) | |
| Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
| Display Modes | |
| |
![]() Copyright 2006 TrumpetMaster.com |
All times are GMT -4. The time now is 09:40 PM.
Powered by vBadvanced CMPS v2.2.0/Links 1.01 Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.7.2 Copyright ©2000 - 2008, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd. Search Engine Optimization by vBSEO 3.0.0 RC8 |