Welcome to TrumpetMaster.com

You are currently viewing our trumpet site as a guest, which gives you limited access to many features. By joining our community you will be able to post topics in our trumpet forum, place ads in our classifieds, add your upcoming event to our calendar, communicate privately with other members (PM), and access many other special features. Registration is fast, simple and absolutely free!

We hope you will join our community today!


Go Back   TrumpetMaster > Equipment > Horns


Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes
Old 11-01-2006, 02:52 PM   #1
Pianissimo User
 
Martin Williams's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2005
Location: Columbus, Oh-hi-uh
Posts: 198
Martin Williams is an unknown quantity at this point
Send a message via AIM to Martin Williams Send a message via Yahoo to Martin Williams
Couesnon v Yamaha 6310Z

Ive been told and from what ive been able to see the Yamaha 6310Z is more or less a copy of the Couesnon Flugelhorn

I was just wondering how similar are they really? What are the differences? Is the Couesnon replaceable with the Yamaha?
Martin Williams is offline  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote
Old 11-01-2006, 04:32 PM   #2
Pianissimo User
 
Join Date: Dec 2003
Posts: 153
gchun is an unknown quantity at this point
First off, I have owned both. I have sold the Cousnon and still have the Z.

The Z uses a standard shank mouthpiece. The Cousnon uses a straight shank, or French taper. I had trouble finding French taper mouthpieces for the Cousnon that worked, so that may have been part of the problem. The horn had a great sound, but the response was uneven (even with the one french taper mpc I had). Pitch was little off, but still very workable.

The Z has very even response. It played well from day one, and it plays even better once I stopped overblowing it. It doesn't need a lot of air to fill the horn. The horn projects well, and it still responds beautifully at soft volumes. Pitch is very good. One problem I have is with the valves. If I use it everyday, everything is fine. But, if I don't, the valves stick. It just takes a little time to get them going.

I've owned a bunch of flugels. The progression is

Yamaha 631 in lacquer
Cousnon in lacquer
Yamaha 635 in silver
Yamaha Z in lacquer

The 635 was close to the Cousnon. The Z is even closer to it. Much more responsive and plays with less effort.

The Z is a perfect fit for me. My point of reference for flugel sound is a very light, nimble sound, (ala Guido Basso, etc.) This horn is perfect for that. I don't care for the huge, tubby flugel sound.

Hope this helps,
Garry
gchun is offline  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote
Old 03-16-2009, 12:47 AM   #3
New Friend
 
Join Date: Oct 2008
Location: ILLINOIS, USA
Posts: 5
dallemand will become famous soon enough
Send a message via ICQ to dallemand Send a message via AIM to dallemand
Re: Couesnon v Yamaha 6310Z

Thanks for the info on the Z, from your respooonse it looks like I'll be caressing the 631OZ for quite some time. I played a few toons on the one I am looking at and it did blow easy and sounded better than I expected. Thanks again.

regards

dallemand
dallemand is offline  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote
Old 03-16-2009, 02:04 PM   #4
New Friend
 
Join Date: Dec 2008
Location: Middleburg, Virginia
Posts: 10
ShaneChalke will become famous soon enough
Re: Couesnon v Yamaha 6310Z

I have a late 60s Couesnon. Yes, the intonation could be better, but the sound is glorious -- velvety, smokey, outstanding for jazz. I had the French taper leadpipe modified to a standard taper by a repair shop for about $25. Don't let the French taper stop you! You can also buy standard taper leadpipes for Couesnon from Charlie's Brass Works.

Cheers.

--Shane
ShaneChalke is offline  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote
Old 03-16-2009, 03:17 PM   #5
Piano User
 
RGood's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2008
Location: Deep in the heart of TX
Posts: 270
RGood will become famous soon enough
Re: Couesnon v Yamaha 6310Z

Quote:
Originally Posted by gchun View Post
First off, I have owned both. I have sold the Cousnon and still have the Z.

The Z has very even response. It played well from day one, and it plays even better once I stopped overblowing it. It doesn't need a lot of air to fill the horn. The horn projects well, and it still responds beautifully at soft volumes. Pitch is very good. One problem I have is with the valves. If I use it everyday, everything is fine. But, if I don't, the valves stick. It just takes a little time to get them going.

Garry
I have a 6310Z also - and found that a lightweight valve oil solves the sticky valve issue - I'm using Hetman Synthetic Light Piston - I'm sure other light oils would work well too - but the regular stuff just gummed up on me really quickly. I agree with you on the sound - and ease of playing the Z.

Bob
__________________
It's a new year - let's have at it!!!

Kanstul 1525 Flugel
Yamaha Bobby Shew 6310Z Flugel
1967 Getzen Eterna (my 2nd - still going strong after all these years)
1961 Olds Special (my 1st...battered, bruised, & passed around but back home)
RGood is offline  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote
Old 03-16-2009, 05:26 PM   #6
Moderator
Utimate User
 
rowuk's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2006
Location: Germany
Posts: 7,355
rowuk has much to be proud ofrowuk has much to be proud ofrowuk has much to be proud ofrowuk has much to be proud ofrowuk has much to be proud ofrowuk has much to be proud ofrowuk has much to be proud ofrowuk has much to be proud ofrowuk has much to be proud ofrowuk has much to be proud of
Re: Couesnon v Yamaha 6310Z

Whover told you that forgot to tell you that Yamaha NEVER has cloned anything. The instruments may "look" like other designs, but that is where the similarity stops. A Couesnon has NEVER been put together as well as any Yamaha, you will NEVER find two Couesnons that play even close to the same.

I am not trashing Couesnon, Yamaha is just in another technical league. As far as the sound goes, the Yamaha is not as "intimate".

There are many lovers of "historic" or "vintage" instruments here - I am one of them, but at the end of the day, you get lucky with an old horn. Yamaha is not luck, it is skill.

Play before you pay - unless you are only collecting!
__________________
Whenever I feel blue, I start breathing again.
rowuk is offline  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote
Old 03-16-2009, 08:36 PM   #7
Pianissimo User
 
Martin Williams's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2005
Location: Columbus, Oh-hi-uh
Posts: 198
Martin Williams is an unknown quantity at this point
Send a message via AIM to Martin Williams Send a message via Yahoo to Martin Williams
Re: Couesnon v Yamaha 6310Z

For what its worth, I've since sold my Cousenon and I play a 6310Z mostly for jazz work, and also a Getzen Eterna (three valve) for band work. Love them both!
Martin Williams is offline  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote
Reply


Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Couesnon Flugels Martin Williams Vintage Trumpets / Cornets 4 10-28-2006 09:46 PM
New Yamaha Trumpet? eisprl Trumpet Discussion 1 10-15-2006 02:18 AM


Unleash Your Anger

TrumpetMaster
Copyright 2006 TrumpetMaster.com
All times are GMT -4. The time now is 04:32 AM.

Powered by vBadvanced CMPS v2.2.0/Links 1.01
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.7.2
Copyright ©2000 - 2009, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Content Relevant URLs by vBSEO 3.3.0

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25