Welcome to TrumpetMaster.com

You are currently viewing our trumpet site as a guest, which gives you limited access to many features. By joining our community you will be able to post topics in our trumpet forum, place ads in our classifieds, add your upcoming event to our calendar, communicate privately with other members (PM), and access many other special features. Registration is fast, simple and absolutely free!

We hope you will join our community today!


Go Back   TrumpetMaster > Equipment > Horns
Horns Discuss Weighted Receivers in the Equipment forums; I guess I really never knew...... I've seen different weights for receivers (i.e. Monette vs Bach vs what ...
Register FAQ Support TM Members List Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read

Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 01-11-2008, 11:31 PM   #1 (permalink)
hubnub
Pianissimo User
 
hubnub's Avatar

 
Join Date: May 2007
Location: Cleveland
Brand: Monette
Posts: 179
hubnub has a spectacular aura about
Weighted Receivers

I guess I really never knew...... I've seen different weights for receivers (i.e. Monette vs Bach vs what ever brand you can think of) and was wondering what the purpose is? Response? Intonation? Just curious. I have a friend who has a Kanstul 1500A and his has one.... pretty much swallows his mpc too.
__________________
ZeuS ZTR 1000
Monette STC-1 Prana B4 Slap, B4FL, B4LD
http://www.myspace.com/markrussojazz
hubnub is offline  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote
Old 01-12-2008, 12:19 AM   #2 (permalink)
burgerbob
New Friend

 
Join Date: Nov 2007
Location: Douglas, WY
Brand: Yamaha, NYTC
Posts: 45
burgerbob will become famous soon enough
Send a message via MSN to burgerbob
Re: Weighted Receivers

They have the same purpose as the rest of the heavy horn, to make it heavy, to focus the vibrations, etc. If they are heavy enough, I find that they balance the horn a little better, but not by much.
__________________

FTW!

Me play brass.
burgerbob is offline  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote
Old 01-12-2008, 02:02 PM   #3 (permalink)
Brekelefuw
Mezzo Forte User
 
Brekelefuw's Avatar

 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: Toronto
Posts: 897
Brekelefuw has a spectacular aura about
Send a message via MSN to Brekelefuw
Re: Weighted Receivers

The leadpipe and reciever are some of the most important parts of sound production because they are closest to where the vibrations are coming in. Changing things in that area of the trumpet can affect a horn quite a bit.
Brekelefuw is offline  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote
Old 01-13-2008, 05:57 AM   #4 (permalink)
rowuk
Moderator
Fortissimo User
 
rowuk's Avatar

 
Join Date: Jun 2006
Location: Germany
Brand: Nat, Piston, Rotary
Posts: 3,923
rowuk is a glorious beacon of lightrowuk is a glorious beacon of lightrowuk is a glorious beacon of lightrowuk is a glorious beacon of lightrowuk is a glorious beacon of lightrowuk is a glorious beacon of light
Re: Weighted Receivers

There is a lot of VOODOO concerning weight. Much of what can be accomplished with weight, can also be accomplished with bracing. That being said, there are several types of interfaces on a trumpet, some "tunable" some not. Any place we solder the tubing together we have to make sure that we have a perfectly smooth transition or a planned step. The resonance in this area can be controlled by the solder joint, bracing and thickness of the tubes. The "movable" parts like slides are generally suspended by a layer of grease and therefore not "damped" like the rest of the horn. The manufacturers use various bracing patterns to optimize the resonance of these parts. The mouthpiece is a different situation. We have a metal to metal contact, but not at solid as a solder connection and we have no bracing. The only way that we can control the resonance here is to optimize the mass. Heavier is not better unless it is part of the total design, just like MegaTone mouthpieces are not universal answers for all players. The effect of the receiver cannot be simply defined as "better slotting, intonation" or whatever. It is dependent on the rest of the horn-including the mouthpiece and bracing.

If we look at horn design, the instrument is an amplifier. Any modification at the mouthpiece end gets amplified most and therefore causes the greatest change in sound and feel! My rule of thumb is: on trumpets not designed for mass, adding it makes the slotting better at the cost of intonation. This leads to drilling the mouthpiece out to make the intonation "fuzzier" which makes the slotting less prominent. No net gain with a frankentrumpet.
__________________
Whenever I feel blue, I start breathing again.
rowuk is offline  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote
Reply




Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 
Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Looking French taper Flugelhorn (for Couesnon style receivers) MPC Bob Odneal Vintage Trumpets / Cornets 1 07-21-2007 11:05 PM
Olds cornets, small receivers A.N.A. Mendez Horns 1 03-27-2007 08:05 AM


Unleash Your Anger

TrumpetMaster
Copyright 2006 TrumpetMaster.com
All times are GMT -4. The time now is 05:48 AM.

Powered by vBadvanced CMPS v2.2.0/Links 1.01
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.9
Copyright ©2000 - 2008, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Search Engine Optimization by vBSEO 3.0.0 RC8

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34